If you are having trouble viewing this e-mail with images, click here.
Please add to your address book to ensure our e-mails reach your inbox.

CSA
Leadership ♦ Research ♦ Advocacy ♦ Newsletter ♦ Speakers ♦ Counties ♦ Alliances ♦ Calendar ♦ Contact
In the October 31, 2008 CSA Update:


Yuma County's Innovation Pays Off
 

A commercial aimed at bolstering recruitment efforts for the Yuma County Sheriff's Office took top honors last week at the 2008 City, County, Communications & Marketing Association's (3CMA) Annual Savvy Awards competition. The 30-second commercial was produced by staff at the Yuma County Government Channel, YUMA 77.

 

"This is one of the highest honors any government communications program can receive and is a tribute to the talented staff at YUMA 77," explained Kevin Tunell, Yuma County Director of Public and Legislative Affairs. "In today's world, county government is forced to do more with less.  It is a testimony to the expertise of Ed Jin and Jesus Corona to bring home a national award of this caliber when pitted against virtually every city and county in the country." 
 
Over 1,000 applications were submitted for the 10 categories of Savvy Awards, which are distributed by The City-County Communications and Marketing Association (3CMA), a leading organization for local governments that are finding new and better ways of communicating with their citizens.  The 3CMA views citizens as customers with important input into the kinds of services offered and how they are provided.
 
Yuma County is no stranger to the Savvy Award program, having received five previous nominations and one actual Savvy for "Most Creative Activities with Least Dollars Spent" in 2004. 
 
Visit YUMA 77 to check out their creativity for yourself.
 

Congress to Consider Additional Funding for AHCCCS

 
Article by Laurie Foran, Legislative Liaison with Barnes and Associates
 
Though the upcoming election has taken center stage, Congress is planning to move forward with another economic stimulus package that could benefit Arizona's counties.  Congress is expected to return to Washington the week of November 17th to discuss two similar proposals being offered by the Democratic leadership in both the House and the Senate.  The proposals, which could include between $150 and $300 billion, call for more direct relief to states and individuals facing their own fiscal crisis. 
 
Many states are struggling to balance their operating budgets due to declining revenues and a weak economy.  As their resources drop and constituent need for many services increases, states are forced to make difficult decisions and are cutting goods and services, laying off state employees, delaying infrastructure investments, limiting Medicaid programs or raising taxes.
 
The new stimulus proposals aim to protect the U.S. from an extended fiscal crisis by trying to meet some of the current financial needs of the states.  By providing relief to the states, the plan differs substantially from the last two finance-related packages passed by Congress (Congress issued $600 tax rebates to individuals in January and enacted a $750 billion investment in financial system in September.)
 
The House leadership's new stimulus proposal includes $14 billion in fiscal relief for states.  One way fiscal relief would be provided is through a temporary increase in the federal share of Medicaid program costs: under the proposal, states are divided into tiers separated by the level of needed assistance based on three economic indicators. However, all states will receive some assistance.  Along with 25 other states, Arizona is assigned "Tier A," which corresponds to the highest level of assistance.  If passed, the House proposal will result in $450 million directed to Arizona through increased Medicaid matching funds. 
 
The Senate leadership's stimulus proposal includes $16 billion in fiscal relief for the states. The plan is similar to the House plan except that it is distributed with the same level of assistance to all states.  It will result in Arizona receiving $485 million through increased Medicaid matching funds.
 
Counties are particularly interested in how these proposals move forward since they apply the federal relief directly to the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), Arizona's Medicaid program to which counties must contribute millions of dollars each year.  Congress used this approach in 2003, when a federal stimulus package helped counties through the post-9/11 recession.  The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 resulted in $10 billion for Medicaid federal matching assistance percentage (FMAP) increases to the states. Over 2003 and 2004, Arizona counties saved $22 million through the portion they are required to pay for the Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS).  As the curtain closes on the election, Arizona's county officials are waiting to see this next act.
 

Photo Radar Ready to Roll Out To Phase II Counties
 
The Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) reports that they are ready to launch their photo enforcement ticket program to a second group of Arizona counties soon.  On November 1, county justice courts in Cochise, La Paz, Navajo, Pima and Yavapai counties will be ready to process the statewide tickets stemming from DPS units that are deployed in their counties.  These counties will join courts in Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Mohave and Pinal counties, which were a part of the Phase I roll-out in late September.
 
DPS has deployed nine mobile units around the state, in addition to more than 20 stationary cameras in Maricopa and Pinal counties.  The cameras are part of a plan to place 100 cameras (60 stationary and 40 mobile) statewide.  Early estimates from the Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting predicted $90 million in revenue generated by the cameras in the first year.  The revenues will be directed to the state general fund; county justice courts receive no compensation for processing the tickets. 
 
Although the courts will go online on November 1, DPS does not plan to post photo enforcement mobile systems in the Phase II counties until the end of the month.  After being snapped by a photo radar camera, a defendant would have 40 days to pay the $181.50 fine or deny the citation.  If the defendant fails to pay, the citation will be transmitted to courts; Phase II courts can therefore expect to see tickets sometime in January. 
 
The remainder of the counties in the state will follow in Phases III and IV of DPS's deployment, which are scheduled for December and February.
 

County Planners Work Toward Improved Statutes
 
The Arizona County Planners Association continued their analysis of county statutes last week at a meeting with their county planning and zoning attorneys and CSA.  The group's efforts have identified technical changes and clarifications that will improve the current state law.

"What killed the update about 20 years ago was the desire by some stakeholders to make substantive changes to the statute," explained Bill Towler, Coconino County Community Development Director.  "This time we're focusing only on rearranging statutes to bring some order to the A.R.S. chapter.  There may be quite a few things that folks want addressed or changed in county planning and zoning laws but that's not what this is about.  This is about bringing some much-needed order to the planning and zoning statute for counties."

Arizona's planning and zoning statutes date back to 1949 and were based on model acts written in the 1920s.  Furthermore, the statutes have been routinely tweaked in many of the years since their enactment.  Each amendment has added to the confusion and has resulted in both poorly-worded and poorly-organized direction to Arizona's counties.
 
The technical corrections that have been identified would align county planning laws with county zoning laws, and would establish a reasonable order to the current statutes that jump from subdivision regulation to comprehensive planning and from Boards of Adjustment to rezoning.  The corrections would also allow future changes to county statutes to be streamlined; current proposals are usually added onto statutes haphazardly, creating more confusion.
 

County supervisors will consider the Planners Associations proposal at its Legislative Summit for possible inclusion in the CSA legislative Agenda for 2009.      

 

SWEEP Hosts Workshop on Green Building

 

The Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) held a workshop on Wednesday for local building officials on green building codes and programs throughout the state. Representatives from counties, cities, tribal groups, homebuilders, and green consulting organizations met at ASU to discuss the latest trends in green building.  ASU's Global Institute of Sustainability co-sponsored the forum.

 

Hosted by Arizona SWEEP representatives Jeff Schlegel and Beth Nelson, the workshop began with a presentation from ASU about the history of building codes.  ASU Professor of Architecture Harvey Bryan explained that building codes implemented nationally since the 1970's have failed to result in significant energy savings, going beyond those codes and using local groups and governments to encourage efficient building was essential.  He envisions a system in the U.S. that models the building codes in the United Kingdom and other places in the European Union.  Such a system would charge a fee for any home which is not energy efficient enough, as part of a carbon emissions cap and trade system.

 

Eric Mikela, an expert on green building codes from the Mikela Group, presented on developments in residential and commercial building efficiencies.  He offered an update on the types of steps that local communities across the nation are taking to encourage buildings that are energy efficient, livable and comfortable, and also use water, wood, and other resources efficiently.  He discussed the importance of educating residents on energy efficiency, "because the best built home in the world isn't efficient with the windows open."

 

Mikela also offered tips for communities hoping to begin a green building program to encourage residents to go beyond existing building codes.  He stressed the importance of including stakeholders from the beginning, offering incentives such as shorter plan reviews for participating in the program.  Representatives from Pima County and the City of Scottsdale also presented information on their local green building programs.


More information about local green building programs is available at www.swenergy.org.

 

Calendar
 
Visit the CSA Calendar of Events at www.countysupervisors.org/calendar.
 
  
 
County Supervisors Association of Arizona
1905 W. Washington, Suite 100
Phoenix, Arizona 85009
Privacy & Security Statement

Leadership / Research / Advocacy / Newsletter / Speakers / Counties / Alliances / Calendar / Contact